今天，纽约地方法院的陪审团作出一致的初审意见，认为对三十四项检方提交的罪名川普有罪。

新闻报道里说，这是a jury of his peers。那意思是这十二个陪审员是川普的“同类人”。为什么这样说？

ChatGPT给出了这样的解释：

The phrase "jury of his peers" refers to the constitutional right in many democratic legal systems for a person accused of a crime to be judged by a group of fellow citizens. This principle is enshrined in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to an impartial jury. Here’s why it’s called a "jury of his peers":

1. **Representation**: The term "peers" means that the jury is made up of individuals from a similar community or society as the defendant. This aims to ensure that the defendant is judged by people who can understand their circumstances and societal norms.

2. **Impartiality**: A jury of peers helps to ensure impartiality and fairness in the trial process. The idea is that a diverse group of individuals, representative of the community, can provide a balanced perspective, reducing the potential for bias.

3. **Historical Context**: The concept dates back to Magna Carta in 1215, which established that freemen should not be subjected to judgment except by their equals. This principle has evolved but still fundamentally supports the notion that legal judgments should come from one’s community rather than a distant authority.

4. **Legal Definition**: Legally, a "jury of peers" does not mean people who are identical to the defendant in every way (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic status) but rather a cross-section of the community that ensures a fair trial. The jurors are selected through a process designed to vet and eliminate potential biases.

Thus, the term "jury of his peers" is integral to ensuring that the justice system operates fairly and equitably, reflecting the collective judgment of a diverse and impartial group of citizens