But if you use the other social medias, you still need to grow your audience to be heard..
I think communities is the word.
Because if you join and have a # introductions post, people will interact immediately. And if you join for Bitcoin then you have a lot of people to interact with.
But there are no communities for other interests. Just communities of friends. And you need shared interests to create friends.
So it becomes a chicken and egg situation. Maybe if someone with an established following joins nostr instead of sending their followers to discord that would work.
this is a big problem. two of my favourite things are trapped in the youtube and telegram silos. both of them would benefit from a freer flow of discussion, i think, but i also think that moderation and curation tools are lacking
Thread collapsed
"needing to be heard" is the business of media personalities who have a mechanism for subscription or monetization.
idk why people don't get it that this does not exist on nostr. it's just a messaging protocol. it's not a company selling your data to advertisers to trade with influencers who bring eyes to see the ads.
I don't need to use social media so there's no NEED.
But I do WANT people to see and interact with my posts. Nothing to do with monetizing.
but who is going to store the data, and how will they pay for that?
I would pay if it improved (or enabled) my experience.
you are at least one step ahead of most people
A lot of people pay for x or facebook, or donate to streamers. I don't agree..
yeah, unsurprising since it actually costs something to do all this communication. the services have been largely paid for by advertisers, and apparently nobody wants to watch ads. so you gotta pay. this is my main gripe with the mentality of nostr people. an unfortunate majority of them are in this limbo where they are used to being able to send messages to get stored places but they don't want to have their messages manipulated, filtered or augmented with advertising.
you can't have property without costs. being able to store messages somewhere costs someone and unless your messages benefit them and increase their revenue, they are eventually going to put paywalls up
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
but you won't think about the fact that the communication you are already using is costing someone to implement. that's a problem.
They're not charging me, that's on them really...
hahah, but when they say "no pay no send messages" then what?
that's the thing that is dawning on the users of the internet these days. but the second and third order consequences of this are still opaque
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed