No, the laws against murder are clear, obvious and just, provided due process is in place. But if it’s speech, then it’s for the citizens themselves to handle. The Constitution accounts for all of this.
Discussion
What is clear, obvious and just is an action of reasoning.
Anyway, don't take for grant that we are all living in the US, we are doing a (difficult) general thinking.
Even the US government censored speech (Biden’s retarded disinformation bureau). So it’s not about the actual place, but the principles enshrined in the Constitution which apply anywhere, whether the tyrants in a particular government are abiding by them or not. We are discussion what *should* be the case, not what is. And what should be the case is free speech, with narrow exceptions for incitement to immanent violence, libel and fraud.