You know where else the CDC is cited? The more recent paper you attached.
So for the first article "All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response" I agree with at least some of what is written there. The govt made a lot of bad decisions some of which were very likely intentional, but this is extremely early on in the pandemic. Moreover the article leans heavily on virus science. It doesn't dispute the existence of viruses, it considers covid-19 to not be significantly different from other seasonal viruses.
The more recent article "COVID-Period Mass Vaccination Campaign and Public Health Disaster in the USA" doesn't appear to have ever been put on medrxiv like they said that they would where it would have had greater scrutiny. This study once again doesn't concern the existence of covid or viruses in general. It merely critiques the vaccines effectiveness. Did you actually read my post you replied to earlier where I said the vaccine is dangerous and has poor efficacy?
My main critique would be related to "Whereas, no known respiratory-disease virus specifically targets residents living in poverty (Figure 20), irrespective of age (Figure 23)." This is not true, poor people are known to have poorer health outcomes.
"Across the lifespan, residents of impoverished communities are at increased risk for mental illness, chronic disease, higher mortality, and lower life expectancy."
The rest of the paper is related to fatter, sicker people dying more often. Yeah, what a surprise. Thanks for wasting my time I guess?
