None of this is true.

There has been ONE serious nuclear plan accident in the history of Mankind and that was Chernobyl, which was a flawed RBMK reactor design, being run recklessly by a totalitarian communist regime that was already warned of the dangers of the design, and disregarded them.

#Nuclear is only expensive if you use LCOE models that do not include all backup, firming and extre required transport infrastructure. Lasard's LCOE models are being revised to prevent this misuse.

Waste storage is included in nuclear power cost calculations, and the costs you cite are picked out if thin air. You are also ignoring the waste and toxicity issues of Wind & PV Solar energy.

All the worlds nuclear waste generated the past fifty years can be stored in concrete caskets on a space the size of four football fields. Besides, the waste is only a problem if you do not make modern reactor types, or even older breeder reactor designs like Canadian CANDU or the French Super-Phenix.

Also, Thorium reactors will diminish the purported waste problem, since Th-reactor models can "burn" high-level waste from Uranium reactors down to medium-level waste at worst, as part of it's notmal fuel cycle.