Whether it’s atoms or nature, the first thing to be said is this: I am a part of a world controlled by nature. Secondly: that I have a relationship with other, similar parts. And with that in mind I have no right, as a part, to complain about what is assigned me by the whole. Because what benefits the whole can’t harm the parts, and the whole does nothing that doesn’t benefit it. That’s a trait shared by all natures, but the nature of the world is defined by a second characteristic as well: no outside force can compel it to cause itself harm.

So by keeping in mind the whole I form a part of, I’ll accept whatever happens. And because of my relationship to other parts, I will do nothing selfish, but aim instead to join them, to direct my every action toward what benefits us all and to avoid what doesn’t. If I do all that, then my life should go smoothly. As you might expect a citizen’s life to go—one whose actions serve his fellow citizens, and who embraces the community’s decree.

- Gigachad Marcus Aurelius, philosopher king and the emperor of Rome

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A just outcome will always benefit me more than an unjust one no matter what side of the equation I’m on. Instead of viewing my personal preferences as just, I will therefore make what’s just my highest preference.

And the antithesis of this is the bolshevik mind. Abhors nature and natural law because they can’t control it. Think they are wiser than nature, which in their view is flawed, and needs improvement. Every single manifestation of this sick ideology shows a resentment against natural law and so wishes to destroy it, to control it by wrapping it in nice words like equality, freedom, “fraternité”. From aristocrats vs bourgeoisie, to women vs men, to gays vs straight, to trans vs “cis”, it all stems from the same resentment of something outside of their control, and so must be destroyed.