💯 And even before that, there is no logical argument that says a miner deserves to be or remain profitable in the first place. The difficulty adjustment allows hash rate to come and go without severely impacting the overall performance of the network. If a miner becomes too big to sustain their operation on current fees and block reward, then they need to scale back or shut down and that hash rate will go elsewhere over time. There is no need for bail outs or welfare to keep miners afloat, and that’s what the spam-advocates seem to want.
The block reward will be substantial enough for decades to come, and transaction fees have already passed what the block reward will be in 30 years. There is no logical argument that goes, “we need spam so miners remain profitable.”
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsplg3rdj456y7hmgh3nwj4u2knmp0z3syu0h3y32nuqhffu9ud3gqfk468l
Discussion
mining Bitcoin is not a real job, and if you want it to be a real job, then you need to create a business that harvests the ambient energy produced from your goddamn rigs.
sell that energy back to the locale.
learn to give back all that you have taken.
circular economy.
nostr:nevent1qqs2m2h90sddrwvnw9wktzvua57gdd788d0qvghrn7y954pl3t7zevguudkdf
see here for my counter:
tldr is the current state of the filters offers a liquidity line to large miners to scrape these transactions up.
not arguing to remove the filter but really want to clear up the discussion more!
nevent1qqstyjtdrlql9ausyel992q2t4naaqkr0qe60dhp6hts89wfmp2463qpndmhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0y5erqamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep0y5erqffjxpshvct5v9ez2v3swaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5hj2v3sy5erqctkv96xzu39xgc8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6te9xgc8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7ffjxpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9utjlx7p