Transferring Sats with a high level of privacy and zero fees is truly satisfying. This is just the beginning.
Discussion
Lo único que habría que mejorar es que cuando comparto una factura para que alguien la reclame no se las lleven rápido los bots
⏳️🧑💻👩💻🧑💻👩💻🧑💻
₿ULLISH
Show me
LNBC210N1PJHNMR8SP5ERM4F6Q7PKLE7GY2PHRM37AA05N95HUE3FMFWUA3PV2ZF6NCJR9SPP5RHSHAHFD5L8Y6EFJPUDU9P3CQZ33QT7YA2Q6Z95D6V58HAJEEK2QDQGV4H82ARNXQZJCCQPJRZJQFK55KSVLGK0RA4M7K022DCPULUWPFXL4M00C4NKPUWJAP446HTP2RP4CYQQ5ZSQQYQQQQLGQQQQXGQQXG9QXPQYSGQJ5UK0DK93RL89L8T2R683T6VGQG4SH6GAACE9GHEV79MJXAFLPYKTP0ATPE075QPYNC99EE7V9ZDZS8V2H25EKNURHF08FX9S7G2VDGQEX9HEG
Quick question:
In a world where regulatory bodies decide to crack down on any type of custodial situation (especially privacy preserving non-KYC things like cashu) - how do you see that playing out in terms of people running mints?
I'm positive people will still do it, but I wonder what best practices for verifying your mint is trustworthy/has some skin in the game to prevent rugpulls.
i continue to see the need for secret rogue remote services like nodes, servers, mints located in less hostile jurisdictions … like in the back of a nice little cantina in El Salvador
Preventing rugpulls is nearly impossible. A rugpull can be intentional or forced. Mint hosters cannot guarantee anything, and if they do, they lie.
What could indicate a 'trustworthy' provider is transparent communication, good support, community engagement, positive word-of-mouth propaganda, and incentives like service fees, etc. But all of this does not rule out a rugpull.
The wallet can also help by reminding, indicating, and suggesting actions, but in the end, the user has to manage risks himself.
Much work is remaining for adoption to even be considered.