China is the first large and over-indebted economy to have (1) recognized that there is a problem and (2) made the decision to attempt to address the problem. Keynesian thinking is all but gone, but how to navigate the way forward is still totally uncertain.

It is also the case that key (and quite powerful) constituencies would rather go back to the debt fueled growth model and are resisting the necessary change.

For those interested, continue to monitor all things “China economy” over the next several years. It will provide critical context for what lays ahead for all G7 nations. Then again, the primary difference will be that China looks to be taking a proactive stance on addressing the issue where as the G7 nations may have their hand forced with not much ability to do so thoughtfully.

https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3253407/chinas-two-sessions-2024-have-new-pressures-already-fractured-last-years-economic-model

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Has this been adopted by academia at all yet?

Not at all. For too much focus on the "evil" China as the next great global threat. and virtually no real genuine, apolitical consideration as to what is going on with policy to retrofit the economy.

There is also a deep primacy bias in academia (the so called "Old China Hands) when it comes to #China. They, too, are in agreement that what ails China requires nothing more than a return to the debt-fueled growth model.

I mean academia within China. I'm not sure that was clear as it seems you are referring to Western academia.