Nah, that's way too clean and convenient.

Even in your anarcho-capitalist paradise, you'd still have technological shocks, changing preferences, resource discoveries, natural disasters, and entrepreneurs constantly disrupting existing patterns.

Schumpeter's "creative destruction" happens with or without the state. Every new iPhone throws buggy whip manufacturers into disequilibrium.

The state definitely ADDS layers of artificial disequilibrium through regulations, subsidies, and monetary manipulation. But saying it's the ONLY source? That's just ideological comfort food.

Markets are dynamic systems. Disequilibrium is a feature, not a bug - even without government interference.