What I liked was that it’s such a fun concept. I love that it could be true, and yet it naturally has a very small set of evidence that doesn’t seem like hard evidence, just clues at what could be facts.

The whole time, he’s like, “I don’t know, I’m just a journalist, but we should study this and not block it from study.” I can get behind that part.

I do know that we find ourselves wrong a lot, until one solid piece of evidence shows up then we have to rewrite a bunch of shit. 😂

He gets really out there in his mind over matter and drug induced telekinesis humanity stuff. But on the timeline and geological research, I like the questions being asked.