It's just confusing... people always think a username is unique. Having multiple @jack's is bad UX.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

some people would rather not use their real names though

Thank you

I use "display" name (doesn't need to be real) and it doesn't create the expectation of uniqueness

how do your mentions appear inline, with display_name ??

Yep

Like this

Also these replies don’t seem be nip10 valid and I can’t tell what you’re replying to

oh wait I might have a bug actually.. hmm

Yep, sorry. I am still in the old format. Gotta fix that.

ok I’ll try to add support for no-username …

💯

What’s the best way to pull your name up in Damus when typing a note? That’s all that matters here for client compatibility.

display_name is an unspec’d damus field meant for just a way to show a real-name on your profile, the fact it is now required for cross-compatible mentions is a bit annoying.

As an @jack…I agree

👀

👀

Can I still be Alice?

I was thinking of changing it to Alicewontactright..

On Bogbook awhile back I had someone coming on and identifying as @ev, which looked exactly the same as my handle, which is @ev, and then pretending to be me while I was sleeping.

The solution I came up with was to provide a small in-line public key hint:

After I did that whoever it was cut it out, because everyone could see he had different public key than my own.

* had a different public key [...]

Anyway, the issue is a little bit wandering towards Zooko's triangle, but that's the solution I came up with.

Impressive

Jack with a Spanish accent sounds like hack 🤔

I agree. Too many @jacks and you won't no jack shit about who you're actually speaking to.