Thousands of exchanges around the world and only a handful support lightning. Why?

Because exchanges would need a full time Bitcoin developer to implement lightning in their business which would cost $100k+

nostr:nprofile1qqsg4k8377xguyvkvfpw9znu59wfx6er4xvat7u3hljwg3ew94h274gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kytcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsfqgkma fixes this

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Typical cost to production node running:

What is the source for this data? I find it fascinating.

The average cost is calculated based on my real costs to run nodeless.io back in the day (minus the salary of course)

What took 3 hours for updating LND? From my exp its stop service, git pull, git checkout, make install with tags, start service.

Taking a bit of time to understand the update, if we want to actually run then update - evaluating it basically

Gotcha. Interesting stuff. Makes sense.

I have spent maybe 1 hour per year managing liquidity, do people do that?

Integrating lightning into your systems is likely where all the costs are though. Very expensive. Shakepay at one point hit me up as a potential hire to do that, i never accepted. they still don’t have lightning integrated πŸ˜…

Do you have that contact info? We actually built this with them in mind. We are fintrac registered and everything

He’s @aiouy on twitter, i talked with him there

If you are an exchange doing lots of liquidity swaps, probably way higher

This is B2B context

BONUS: you don't try to implement a new standard either. UMA is dumb.

I also don't think this is the way. We build on open standards only πŸ«‘πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»

UMA is an open standard.

But love to see new competition in the LN infrastructure space. Wishing you luck!