Nostr Web Client

So you would know that claim of 500 “witness” comes from St. Paul as he writes to the Greeks. Which, as a collective, were very skeptical…but you know this already.

Yet he put a hard number on this. Why? It would be easy to rebuke if not true.

You would also know that in tradition at the time, 500 would refer to grown men that could serve as a “witness” and testimony. So anyone that actually studies history would agree that 500 witnesses would be men, and likely at least double that number in persons that wouldn’t be able to serve at “witnesses”. But okay.

MAHDOOD 1y ago

Now you’re changing your claims and using the Bible as evidence again. This is like saying the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective because Pfizer said so. And then you keep repeating that Pfizer said it’s safe and effective. “Jesus is god because the Bible said so.” I already told you there are other books that say Jesus never existed and never rose from the dead. Why should I believe you over them? Seriously answer this one simple question. Why should I believe your books over these other books written by atheists? Give me a good answer I’m getting bored now, we’ve been going in circles 😴

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

BeesKnees 1y ago

No I am using what documentation existed at the time.

Answer: because truth is truth, regardless of whether you want to accept it or not.

Peace!

MAHDOOD 1y ago

These books also use documentation that existed at the time to prove Jesus never existed but okay peace ✌️

BeesKnees 1y ago

And your claim he never existed brings us full circle - you want a rabbit hole, Shroud of Turin.

Wish you the best.