Nostr Web Client

NIP05 should be “mandatory”.

Spinning up npubs is free. Attaching them to domains isn’t.

If we want to rid ourselves from domains we have a different problem but we can work on that AFTER we solve the current one.

utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 1y ago

I strongly disagree with this, you shouldn't have to trust a domain or sign up for something outside of nostr to use nostr

But of course I am happy to see many people try many things

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

StackSats.IO 1y ago

Sure.

Then your npub is a burner. You can post into the wind on https://anonostr.com

I’m not opposed to people posting with Burners at all. That’s a legit usecase and I hope to see users of it by following hashtags.

I’m opposed to my feed being spammed by accounts which I should easily be able to filter because the client devs don’t want to give me any further tools to handle my feed.

If anon accounts want to spam a hashtag I can unfollow if. OR I can have thresholds like I’m suggesting.

This is Nostr bumping up against ancap limits. Ancap doesn’t work in a world of zero friction - it just doesn’t.

Girino Vey! 1y ago

not sure where the "ancap" thing comes from. I'm usually considered center-left, and still agree with that making you dependent on an external provider is a bad idea.

Nothing to do with "bumping up against ancap limits", just with having nostr be independent of any kind of central authority. NIP-05 is just NOT the solution for a censor free ecosystem.

StackSats.IO 1y ago

Nostr Will be infused with Ancap ideals

Based on the founders.

You might not like if but how it is.

Girino Vey! 1y ago

I like it just fine exactly because i don't confuse the creation and the creator... the creation is awesome, even if the creators are flawed humans...

NowClip 1y ago

But it’s step in the right direction I think. I’m still not sure how they work technically but I know I look for accounts with NIP05 casue I know at least they bothered doing it.