Replying to Avatar hit with a hint of s

Nah, shitty speed - yes.

With multiple servings nodes still borderline acceptable. (Though running 15 physical server at home is also not really normal or cheap as running costs go.

Risk - nots so sure. 3x redundancy plus backup makes it quite safe. Though offsite backup of this amount is anything but cheap.
Avatar
captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜 1y ago

1. i consider risk one large disk / stick failure more important n loss hence buy breakup smaller ones given i dodnot need super high parallel capacity

2. ur data is money making n critical - have layered solution - like if u one offsite then HDD in mainsite n offsite both are fine - unlike both will fail - DR check is must

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
hit with a hint of s 1y ago

100% with you

Only

- It is hard to not put „critical” tag on memories or on unhappiness of the wife (in case of loss)

- my setup is almost 10y old. Technology moves faster than my finances grow.

- one day I would love to be all on energy’s efficient boards and NVMe ( though I bet as soon as I start buying new shit - technology will move again)

- don’t try to fix what is not broken

Avatar
captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜 1y ago

just make sure u loss no data never happens -whichever way to do it - dnot matter technolgy - they try push the buyers to spending more

Avatar
hit with a hint of s 1y ago

I am yet to lose some.

Moosefs is pretty awesome