Whatever you say, I’m not trying to convince you of anything; just calling you out.
Discussion
You haven’t called me out, you just said i was gaslighting and didn’t point to anything specifically. Good job 👍 you must have 2 brain cells
Thanks, you’re pretty retarded yourself. Must be fun being around you.
Can you just specify it kinda closer?
You know, I’m a dumb user of Nostr, not a dev.
So I’m interested where JB gaslighting because I want to understand it.
Don’t be generic and let’s go staring to the point.
1. See the quoted text in the first post.
2. Click on it for context.
3. Read the whole thread.
4. Every statement of nostr:nprofile1qqsr9cvzwc652r4m83d86ykplrnm9dg5gwdvzzn8ameanlvut35wy3gpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuegq5rs82 is disingenuous.
5. How it is disingenuous, I hear you ask. Actually, you can tell a lie by saying the truth. He’s making statements like “you can’t stop spam” and “filters don’t stop anything” (technically true), but obfuscating the part that you can prevent significant quantities of spam being created in the first place by running filters. Bypassing filters is nuanced, requires some technical expertise, time, and oftentimes costs more than standard txs. He omits this important context, and makes the obvious statement that spam can’t be stopped by filters, by conveniently missing the “but” part. Telling half truths is considered disingenuous by people that are not socially retarded. Hope you’re not socially retarded, otherwise you might not get it… just like Will.
That’s what I wanted! Straight to the point. Now I’m starting catching up on the rest of your point.
it only sounds disingenuous when you don't understand the technical details
nostr:note18hkztahjp3nfle7le06u7wmw9uryyd2quy4m536jtpne7du58kqs9z8gdz
it's not that hard to run a libre node and just get it to connect to other libre nodes and miners. people who want to build data protocols would just use those nodes and have reliable tx delivery. running knots nodes doesn't do shit.
Sheesh, now I also got your point.
So to block all the spam on the blockchain, it have to be centralized?
Because after your explanation, I don’t see any scenario where whole 100% of bitcoin decentralized nodes will agree to run same thing.
Cool!
Thats why I love discussing straight to the topic instead of yapping generic stuff.
Thanks to both of you. 🙏
Probably going back to the BtcCore.
To block the spam you would need to hardfork bitcoin and change consensus, and keep hardforking every time the spammers get around the blockades