You are a bit ignorant. As nostr:npub1nccwjspr3nv7h67xx2qhdh2dzzvpyy55gte2dsu8yl7xd7n74y9qydz7mj told you, nothing prevents a user from sending twice to the same address or to any other address, the software cannot prevent this.

Why don't we talk about the ricochet fees address burned into the samourai code through which you can trace all the addresses that have used ricochet or that samourai doesn't handle tor identities in the android app or Sparrow, or that in the whirpool desktop client it constantly reuses the tor input circuit or the xpub that was leaked in the android client?

Wasabi have continued forward selflessly with a coinjoin with 0 fees, you samourai guys were either morons for adopting a poorly built solution or you were simply paid by the samourai team.

nostr:note1sks56vejx3jj6zdu3u55q8rrrc250cfuynt58jasm60gxzen58ks8r8ud0

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I don't care about legal issues, just the code.

I have never defended wasabi, I have always defended decentralized solutions, now I do because they are no longer a company and it is a community project at no cost to the user.

Thanks anon for being clear regarding your POV.

And also thanks to nostr:nprofile1qqsxdqfx3t8ywjx5rfx0es0xgqr0hy6mhs6e0q4nm9s37ex4r3n49kgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uq3samnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvekhgtnhd9azucnf0ghscxzjva for posting a coinjoin comparison table, privacy focused. Not all us are code experts and expert in the subject.

I also tell you that the coordinators that there are free of wasabi as kruw's, will end up having problems and is already accumulating a lot of capital.

The reason samourai ended up in jail and wasabi did not was because the latter implemented a chain analysis that allowed banning coins from the coinjoin.

But that has nothing to do with samourai's code being disastrous in many respects.

Ultimately the only viable long term option will remain decentralized coinjoins.