Quoting from #AshtonForbes’ posts that you shared:
« They then mysteriously anonymously emailed the supposed picture taker to get that person to tie their real name and make a debunk video for them. The picture taker couldn't even find their own image on the website.
The image in question didn't reverse image search to the website, only went back to 2016 on the wayback machine, and none of the images in the set existed in any torrents. The website owner should have been able to track down who downloaded the images, but didn't. »
The photo taker said that he took him two minutes to find the photo that he took on February 2009. As I mentioned in a previous note that I shared, the website had changed its domain name in 2016 which is the reason no result are returned prior to this date. You would think that someone like Ashton who has thoroughly investigated the matter would not fail to notice this. It took me maybe 15 min to figure out the inconsistency which leads me to conclude that Ashton’s rebunking is disingenuous. That’s a none starter for me to dig deeper in other Ashton’s claims.
#MH370
Evolving clouds which match up from 2 different angles.
If this is the best debunk you have, that's pretty weak.
I haven’t look into this because I don’t have the expertise to assess the truthfulness of this claim. Even if some clouds are moving, it could have been the fraudsters who would have added a moving effect to make the video looks more real. I wouldn’t be able to tell which one is true.
I stick to the elements I can deterministically assess and based on those, it appears to me that some of Ashton’s claims are disingenuous. Extraordinary claims demand impeccable evidences.
#MH370
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
While I have VFX experience, I'm not an expert because it is not my primary job - I outsource to animators and have been working with video for almost 2 decades. Creating something like this given all the information at the time is far more improbable than probable. The alternative hypothesis would be AI.
Where is the wreckage? If it washed up on the shores of Africa like initially claimed, why would they reopen the search a few months back?
People who work directly in VFX reaffirm the improbability of this being fake.
https://video.nostr.build/3ed315da1aab974ad1e4534859f2da31ce7b47a3d9800a6090501b5664fa0ffb.mp4
I mean, if it’s a fake, it’s definitely State’s sponsored not the art work of one jokester. I’ve seen other analysis from multiple experts pointing out at some inconsistencies on the video. Again, I wouldn’t be able to assess those for myself. I have no strong opinion to what actually happened to #MH370 flight but I would certainly exclud this « orbs narrative » from the probable explanations.
If you look up photos of sightings of saucers prior to the 90s, there are a few with 3 orbs surrounding them. So we have precedent for what we see in the videos, too.
Oh yeah, I’m not saying that orbs don’t exist but I’m highly skeptical of the narrative that they belong to a government or a human-led organization. I’ve found over time that a lot of those pushing this narrative don’t appear so honest.
My best summation is the majority of the phenonena are human, while a small fraction will be other entities. That's the psyop.
The ones who try to debunk this have been the ones who have taken to not being honest. The disconnect comes with a lack of understanding in how this is possible.
I take the opposite side of this take. Humans certainly have worked on reverse-engineering programs but I still have to see concrete evidences that those have been as successful as some pretend. My best guess is that this narrative aims to conceal a greater involvement of an alien race within the human-agenda that most people would be confortable recognizing.
And that's exactly why if they ever execute a fake alien invasion, most people will buy it. Then we can "unite" against the "aliens" by signing up for a global passport and currency system run by AI.
I'm sure the plethora of people who independently discovered many aspects of this technology and were later killed, or the people, like Amy Eskridge, who worked directly in these programs and was later killed (3 years ago), just made it all up. Even though we can now very specifically explain how these things are possible.
I think the « alien invasion » narrative is a distraction. I don’t particularly think it will happen or that some people are planning to fake it. I think, it’s more likely that we’ve already been infiltrated. You’re well aware that there is an agenda at play that can be qualified of « anti-human ». Maybe it is just driven by human psychos or maybe there is more to it. I disagree that most people will buy a fake invasion. It’s actually astounding how many people are aware of the fake alien invasion narrative and a large share of them aren’t particularly interested in the #alien/#ufo phenomena. It doesn’t help that the main proponent of this narrative has made many very dubious claims over the years.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
