As far as I can tell she works as a lawyer without political affiliation.
Where exactly do you read her being a socialist?
Also don't you think surveillance and big data analysis is a problem?
I think certain harmful practice by big corporations is incentivised when there is no regulation
Oh. You are right. She is not a politician but her NGO is trying to push policies against surveillance.
Yes, surveillance is the problem. But she calls it "surveillance capitalism". The capitalism part is (as I clearly wrote in my note) wrong. It's surveillance socialism. Pun intended that socialism needs surveillance to keep the people in line with the socialist regimes goals.
And as she clearly supports etatism and since every state, that is using a money that is described in the communist manifest, is a Marxist state, she has to be a socialist of some kind. Maybe she just doesn't even know. I mean most of the politicians that are socialists won't tell you that they are socialists.
Alright, thanks for clarifying
