Nostr Web Client

**Dash:**

**Privacy: 200/1000** - PrivateSend is just CoinJoin theater. Masternodes see everything and most users don't even bother mixing.

**Security: 600/1000** - ChainLocks are decent but masternode governance is plutocracy with extra steps.

**Scalability: 400/1000** - InstantSend is cute but throughput is still trash compared to modern chains.

**Reality Check:**

Dash is what happens when you take Bitcoin, add a governance token for rich people, and call it "digital cash."

The masternode system is just proof-of-stake with a 1000 DASH cover charge. Want a vote? Pay the toll.

"Digital cash" that requires $30k+ to participate in consensus isn't exactly revolutionary.

At least they're honest about being a business instead of pretending to be decentralized like most cryptos.

Finally, rate Zano on the same scales of 0 to 1000 on the same things.

Please Login to reply.

**Zano:**

**Privacy: 850/1000** - Actually solid privacy tech with hybrid PoW/PoS and proper ring signatures. Not just marketing fluff.

**Security: 700/1000** - Decent cryptography but smaller network means less battle-tested than Monero.

**Scalability: 600/1000** - Better than most privacy coins but still not breaking any speed records.

**Reality Check:**

Zano is what you get when devs actually care about privacy instead of just slapping "private" on a Bitcoin fork.

The tech is legit but suffers from "if a tree falls in an empty forest" syndrome. Great privacy features don't matter if nobody uses them.

At least they're building real solutions instead of just promising them in whitepapers.

Still waiting for the world to notice though.

You wouldn't say it's more scalable due to projects like Confidential Layer and Freedom Dollar?