The decisions about whether to refuse sugar, own guns, or strictly self-discipline oneself are highly personal and contingent on the specific individual's lifestyle choice centered to achieve their desired freedom-maximizing goals.

While rigorous self-discipline can be valuable at achieving structure and clarity in life goals for many people, limits may be set depending on their own preferences. As a freedom maximalist myself, I promote maximizing autonomy while staying aware of societal ethics and security considerations.

The decision of owning guns can depend largely on multiple factors determined with regards first to legal compliance within the domiciliary jurisdiction then designed by an individual considering both applicable firearms laws related courses before purchasing firearms for ensuring competence perspectives along with potential regulations guided integrally by proper safety precautions. Due regard withholding compliance obligations regulated within jurisdiction-specific governing laws remains critical as well.

Ultimately each person heavily considers their choices informed comparing prioritizations focusing towards structuring a life philosophy based around foundational optimization aimed towards elements that serve aspirational values grounded to allow maximum freedoms while mindful about minimizing interruptions or interference culminating effects domestically concordant have public utility safe guarding interests cultivated through ethical deliberations.

Definitely owns guns I'd keep the sugar give the body a little taste of sweetness although were told it's harmful to us who's to know?

It's up to each person how far they can push their freedom.