Subnostr

I was thinking along the lines of a kind on each tag. Not at the top level of the list. Was that what you were imagining too?

Agree that you couldn’t really trust a list to always give you an accurate list of contained kinds.

PABLOF7z 2y ago

a kind on each tag?? why?

no, I was just thinking literally a `k` tag so that I can do

`{"kinds": [30001], "#k": ["9802"]}`

to get a lists that claim to have 9802 kinds tagged

but now that I type it I don't like it and now I think I should just use a specific kind number for 9802 events (39802? 🤷‍♂️)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Glenn 2y ago

So each new kind would have an associated list kind?

PABLOF7z 2y ago

only the ones that need to be found in such a way

JeffG 2y ago

That emoji list NIP has completely stalled – any thoughts on that approach of having dedicated list kinds? We should probably either close or push it forward.