Well then how about not dunking on people like John and his team who are v intelligent and putting forth an insane amount of energy and resource to build a censorship resistant P2P cryptographically secure protocol- calling pubky permissioned is active defamation of FOSS development {which fine… but don’t do it from a platform of self righteousness}
If you really support decentralization, user freedom, and sovereignty then you support a future where permissionless P2P protocols exist in the HUNDREDS… otherwise it’s just leeching off of NGu tech
