To make any sweeping claims regarding any deity in any direction is unscientific. The greatest argument that can be made is "parsimony". But that's highly subject to the manipulation of perspective. One could say it's not parsimonious that a deity designed the intricacies of the human eye. Another may claim it requires even greater assumptions to claim that the intricacies of the eye simply developed meaninglessly over centuries before it even worked.

It truly is fascinating. But always remember: what was "magic" a millenia ago, is "magnets" today ❤️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

💯, I think the most honest answer should be "We don't know", arguing otherwise is unscientific.

The honest answer is: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

The answer isn't "we don't know", the answer is "what the fuck are you on about?"

Agreed. And what is described in the Bible seems like nothing more than a primitive interpretation of advanced technology. Just my two cents. 👍😬