That doesn't make any sense. Again, you can't hope to differentiate between "AI-assisted" and "AI-generated." Additionally, some artists already copy other styles; only those with significantly different styles gain notoriety in the industry. This will only create more room for absolutely retarded lawsuits like the Konami vs Umamusume case.

I guess I don’t understand what the rule is for art used to train an AI. The rule for selling AI art to the public sounds like it’s the same as the rule for human art, which makes sense to me.