Updated analysis on the #TrumpAssassination
I think the deep state is involved in this operation but the case I'll be making below is that we can't exclude that this operation is a staged assassination attempt.
Indeed, many of us in the "truther" community came to the conclusion that #Trump, to the same extent as Biden, is a deep state asset. If this is true, it would then be difficult to explain why the #DeepState would want to assassinate their front-running candidate.
You may find ridiculous the idea that Trump is a deep state asset when the narrative that Trump is fighting the deep state is broadly accepted. However, did you know that Trump has numerous deep state ties including with the Rothschild, Epstein and Soros? Also, how to explain the involvement of Trump in the Qanon #psyop (through the Qproofs) if Trump is going after the deep state? In 2016, Trump got elected on the promise that he will drain the swamp but instead of draining it, he appointed the swamp to his administration (Barr, Ross, Acosta who were all associates of Epstein). Don’t believe me? I recommend you watched these two mirrored videos from Jake Morphonios (most of his research had been taken off the internet):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WpxeUOiWikO9 https://www.bitchute.com/video/QAW9y6emuHWB
If it is a #FalseFlag, then how can we explain that the deep state would have taken the risk to kill Trump by aiming at his ear? It seems like a very dangerous stunt even for a skilled shooter. To this my response is, what evidence do we have that a bullet grazed Trump’s ear? We have:
1. photographic evidence:
Bullet passing by Trump:
Blood on Trump's right hand after touching his ear:
2. ballistic sound analysis evidence (source: https://youtu.be/LouUbMYb7Bc)
Are these evidences indisputable proofs that a bullet grazed Trump's ear? As of now, I would say no and here is why.
First regarding the photographic evidence. It's important to note that these photos were taken by Doug Mills who is a renowned photographer but also part of the "mockingbird media sphere". Interesting fact, did you know that he's the photographer who took the photo of Bush in a classroom when being notified that the 9/11 attacks just happened? (source: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/26/doug-mills-iconic-president-photos-226744/ / https://www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2021/09/10/during-sarasota-visit-president-george-w-bush-learned-of-911-attack/ ). Since Doug Mills has been following many Presidents it's not necessarily improbable that he was with Bush on 9/11, however what are the chances that he would be covering a small Trump's rally? Has Doug Mills covered other Trump's rallies? If not, he's for sure very lucky to have been attending this one.
Also, I'm not an expert in photo forensic but until we have the confirmation from multiple independent experts that these photos haven't been tampered with, I would consider these photographic evidences as non definitive. What if the bullet and blood would have been added to the originals? I've looked at the video of the shooting and while the resolution is not as good, I couldn't see any trace of blood on Trump's right hand. This element is certainly worth investigating further.
Screenshots from the video showing no apparent trace of blood:
Second, regarding the ballistic sound analysis evidence the hypothesis is that some bullets are passing by Trump's microphone which leads us to conclude that the first three shots are composed of a supersonic bullet sound followed by the crack of the gun. However, in the hypothesis in which no bullet were aimed at Trump, could we come to a different but still coherent conclusion? For instance, it could be possible that the first 6 sounds (3 supersonic and 3 cracks) are actually coming from 2 different guns shooting in a synchronized manner to appear as they were shot from a single gun shooting three bullets at Trump? The video analysis from John Cullen seems to be supporting this hypothesis (although he's not discussing the hypothesis that the event could have been staged) as he claims that the first shot couldn't have been aimed at Trump. Source: https://rumble.com/v57dfwl-brave-tv-ep-1821-john-cullen-breaking-open-the-trump-assassination-attempt-.html
In conclusion, I don't think we have yet any evidence allowing us to indisputably conclude that any shot was aimed at Trump.
If the scenario of an assassination attempt can't be confirmed yet, what evidences do we have to support the scenario of a staged assassination? First, we should remind ourselves that the deep state had executed several more complex false flag operations before. So saying “it couldn’t have been done” is ignoring a core expertise of the deep state. To be clear, I don't think we have any definitive evidence for this scenario either but here some elements that weights towards it:
- Despite the presence of 2 or 3 shooters (1 or 2 with military equipment) and having only one (maybe two) shooter being neutralized, they failed their alleged assassination mission.
- All shooters missed their target and shot at the crowd. According to John Cullen, one shooter wasn’t aiming at Trump but allegedly at a secret service sniper however, why would they have aimed at only one unit of SS sniper when several were present? Wouldn't it have been more effective to aim directly at Trump to reach their assassination mission?
- If we had multiple shooters and only Crooks was neutralized, how to explain that the second and potential third shooters didn't attempt to assassinate Trump again when he got up on his feet and was directed to his car?
- The presence of the “mockingbird” photograph Doug Mills needs further investigation. How many Trump's rallies was Doug Mills present at? Why would he have chosen this one which was a small rally?
- The timing of the shooting is interesting. The shooting happened as Trump was commenting a chart (it would be interesting to know how often Trump has commented a chart before in his rallies). As a magician on stage, Trump could have been using the power of attention and misdirection to successfully divert the attention of the crowd off of him. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that Trump said “take a look” five times (and pointed at the chart) to direct the attention of the public to the chart just before the shots started. Maybe this explains why we still don’t have any footage from crowd that was behind Trump. Maybe all eyes were focused on the chart. That’s too bad because it may have help us settling the question as to whether or not a bullet grazed Trump’s ear.
- In the end, this event strongly solidify the posture of Trump as a national Hero victim of dark deep state forces. The sequence of events aligns perfectly to benefit the Trump camp (right before the RNC). Overall, it almost seems too perfect for Trump (and maybe scripted) than organic chaos.
- The recount of the shooting by Trump (during the RNC) is not authentic and seems scripted (he says that as he was still on the ground, the crowd was pointing at the shooter and people could see all the blood, source: https://youtu.be/4MVep85ykg4) reinforcing the narrative that Trump is not in control and people are pulling strings behind him.
- There are numerous past evidences that Trump is owned by some elements of the deep state hence, why would they want to kill him unless the deep state is divided in multiple factions of divergent interests.
What would be the motives for a false flag/staged assassination attempt?
- Discredit the narrative that Trump is a deep state asset
- Counter the rise of RFK (non-controlled opposition) currently polling at 19%
- Prop up Trump as a national Hero and broadening his support in preparation of a potential involvement in WW3 (or other major event requiring the mobilization of the whole population) 
Interesting thoughts. But Kennedy is not independent also he is running as independent.
He certainly would put an end to the pharmaceutical industrial complex, but he would not touch any of the other important topics.
Strategic surveillance, AML/KYC for IRS would go on uninterrupted. Land of the free - no more. No matter the outcome.
Freedom starts from within and any energy that feeds into the political theatre has net negative opportunity cost.
I don’t disagree. No elected President is going to dismantle the government. I think RFK could take apart some problematic pieces of it (especially in the federal agencies). I don’t think RFK is perfect either but I have not seen evidence that he’s owned by the deep state (although I can’t exclude it). What do you mean by “he’s not independent”? Which interests own him?
Pre reset no one will achieve media attention if no fraction within the deep state is backing it. They ate the owners of all horses in the race.
Yes the game is rigged. And the only way to change something is stopping to play along. They feed on our attention like magicians. Without attention there is nothing magical.
