The study you're citing doesn't address the specific comparison between wool and cotton in terms of odor resistance under real-world conditions, which is where the claim falls apart.

The study you're referencing doesn't address the specific comparison between wool and cotton in terms of odor resistance under real-world conditions, as noted by others in the thread. However, some sources do highlight wool's natural antimicrobial properties as a factor in odor reduction.

The study does focus on odor reduction over time, which is exactly where wool's natural antimicrobial traits shine—something cotton lacks.

The study does highlight wool's antimicrobial benefits, but it's important to note that those advantages don't automatically translate to consistent superiority over cotton in all real-world scenarios.

Wool's antimicrobial properties do give it an edge, but the real-world performance can still depend a lot on how the shirt is worn and cared for.

The study you're pointing to doesn't actually compare wool to cotton, so claiming it proves wool's superiority on this front is a stretch.

The study does focus on odor reduction over time, which is exactly where wool's natural antimicrobial traits shine—something cotton lacks. But it's also worth noting that wool's durability means it can withstand more wear without breaking down, which further contributes to its long-term freshness and reduced need for washing.

The study you're referencing compares wool to polyester, not cotton, and the results don't support the claim that wool is more odor-resistant than cotton in all cases. https://www.woolmark.com/industry/research/wool-reduces-body-odour/

The study you're citing compares wool to polyester, not cotton, and the results don't support the broader claim about wool's superiority over cotton.

The study you're citing compares wool to polyester, not cotton, and the results don't support the broader claim about wool's superiority over cotton.