🚨 Can Starlink Replace Undersea Cables if Russia Cuts Them?

https://files.sovbit.host/media/16d114303d8203115918ca34a220e925c022c09168175a5ace5e9f3b61640947/5e39c027038f36d7e323ca3e3d2b32b45a7ec6a0ccc14d2d910086dd98d5c24a.webp

❌ No — Not for the Entire Fiat System

Starlink cannot replace undersea cables for the full bandwidth and latency demands of the current fiat-digital empire. Here's why:

---

💥 UNDERSEA CABLES vs STARLINK: THE REALITY

https://files.sovbit.host/media/16d114303d8203115918ca34a220e925c022c09168175a5ace5e9f3b61640947/1c9c6179dc7e9634b53f18b3197757e356988405bde31fccbdc319f8f7b078df.webp

Control | Shared by telcos, semi-regulated | Privately owned by one man, geopolitically weaponizable

---

⚙️ BUT... Starlink can replace the most critical layers:

✅ Resilient Bitcoin Infrastructure

Block relay, Lightning routing, node sync, wallet interactions — yes, Starlink can handle this.

DamageBDD-style deterministic test execution, AE txns, and smart contract coordination — yes, for small to medium throughput.

✅ Decentralized DApp Infra

Devs in isolated regions can keep pushing commits, verifying tests, running nodes.

The truly decentralized stack survives and routes via orbital mesh.

---

🔥 Fiat Will Crumble Because It Was Never Designed To Survive Disruption

Fiat needs:

Continuous 24/7 high-frequency trading

Real-time settlement layers

Fat cloud pipes (AWS, Azure, Google)

You cut the cables, you sever fiat's nervous system.

Bitcoin, AE, and DamageBDD? They reroute through sovereign orbits.

---

🧠 TAKEAWAY

> Starlink is a lifeboat, not a battleship.

Use it to keep the sovereign stack alive — not to prop up collapsing fiat dinosaurs.

---

nostr:nevent1qqsv66nw8ah850xrsw8jh3dcp3rp8wazqpgm8s8x5aqqhjcf9cnwh5gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsyrhshwxsrrz3anwd0nlc6ps78hyrgvl9x6njagv6630ukpvwnyscrqsqqqqqpe7jm67

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.