Nostr Web Client

Mostly cuz of 32 bit support .. and extensive documentation on blogs and forums ..

What changed in 12 ?

Those are great reasons I must admit!

I just lost trust in them at version 12 when they sneakily slipped in proprietary software (installer) among other things, while still advertising that they are "FREE SOFTWARE".

Not as bad as Ubuntu, but the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Im with Arch after a deacde or more of using Mint and Trisquel.

Only Trisquel is truly FLOSS.

Arch also includes proprietary blobs in the Linux Kernel like most distros, but they're not lying or misleading anyone. And besides the kernel, everything else is up to me what packages I install.

Nice and lightweight for older machines too.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Satosha 7mo ago

I am not much bought into idea of pure FOSS .. I think Debian is kinda annoying as first thing people do is allow non-free :-)

never tried Arch ..cuz ..as you said "if you want LIFE " :-) which I do .. but maybe one day !

On customizability .. I was (once upon a time) deep into that rabbithole :-) .. wasted lot of time with NixOS .. good learnings but at the end if the day , I realized I only use fbterm, ssh , vim, tmux and w3m .. so plain Debian on a 32 bit machine ..hard wired with internet .. big mug of coffee .. ton of tobacco .. LIFE :-)