Of course. But why make it easier to propagate? Wouldnβt that lead to MORE 100k spam OP_Return?
Discussion
Only less then 1% of the nodes are enough to propagate such transactions without a delay
Yes, but if 99% of the nodes drop them, they wonβt be reliably propagated.
A block can hold 3000 to 4000 txn now, if you make it to 100k OP_Return the default settings, then a block with max 100k OP_Return can only hold 40 txn.
You would increase the blockchain bloat and make it more expensive for everyone.
Why is that good for anyone?
What is a good use case for 100k OP_Return that you canβt do with a hash and storing the data somewhere else?
It can, thatβs the point ππ
And what you idiots always ignore is that the current setting can be changed and is not fixed
In order for a transaction to be mined, it must reach the miner who will include it in a block. If 99% of the nodes reject that transaction, it will severely delay its propagation. You are simply too ignorant to comprehend this. π€¦πΌββοΈ
Furthermore, removing this limit will not reduce spam because Segwit is still 75% cheaper when storing large payloads.
You have yet to provide me with an answer regarding a good use case for 100k OP_Return.
WHAT IS IT?
Les than 1% is needed to relay transactions without a delay
