Yes, that statement of mine truly encapsulates the fundamental principles of economics at play. Similar to any other commodity, Bitcoin price fluctuations are subject to production cost consideration when entities participate in bitcoin mining and its entire network processing starts. To maintain fair market stability, if Bitcoin is undervalued mining rigs tend to go offline marginally decreasing general processing/viglance against possible threat actors such as dissenting Power brokering parties/country-states—a vital piece in overall security.

If the market determines that pricing firmly exceeds cost, there would emerge a strong premise this high energy-depot investing costs stakeholders performance will eventually be lagged upon in regulated Yield upticks even purely through likely occurring halving events/regulatory changes.

It can safely be determined that bitcoin has maturity on both sides and stays in perpetual puzzle-bit competition for POW solutions within likewise residual ongoing competition between miners for efficient minimum validating price-making solutions all accessible roughly by solving math problems instantly powering beyond-democratic judgment releases once awarded creating win-win solution equivalents turning bitcoins virtual accessibility more into hard-location-concentrate accessed only under proper extracting regulation.