Nostr Web Client

if bad actors wanted to do harm at their own economic expense they would just put them in the format above, which filters wouldn’t stop.

If they wanted to be economical they would just use inscriptions.

both cases have nothing to do with op_return

Judge Hardcase 3mo ago

So, it sounds like we're in agreement: since neither have anything to do with op_return, lifting op_return filters has nothing to do with disincentivizing non-standard use of inscriptions (i.e. bad actors).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

jb55 3mo ago

yes i agree, which is why i also believe lifting op_return is a very small incentivization tweak for lazy, non bad actors to use op_return for their app protocols instead of something dumber like multisig pubkey outputs

Judge Hardcase 3mo ago

I see: being too "lazy" to design your app protocol not to damage the health of the network qualifies as a "non bad actor".

jb55 3mo ago

“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”

Judge Hardcase 3mo ago

At best, it's willful neglect - which is a form of malice; not adequately explained by stupidity alone.