nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze and

coinjoin transactions appear to be driven primarily by speculation and

misunderstandings of how complicated spam filtering has historically been.

Filtering spam over the past two plus decades has consistently been a delicate

dance between accuracy and false positives, requiring ongoing adaptation and

refinement of filtering algorithms. This same principle applies to the potential

filtering of spam Bitcoin transactions.

Combating spam is a continuous and ever-evolving endeavor, similar to a

never-ending cat and mouse game. The notion of creating a static filter and

abandoning it is unrealistic. Constant adjustments and updates are necessary to

maintain their effectiveness. This situation is no different, and future

challenges will inevitably arise. When they do, we must question the situations

and infrom those running the application, mining pool, etc. of the potential

issues. By collaborating and openly sharing information, we can develop

solutions that address spam while safeguarding legitimate transactions and

privacy focused transactions.

Simply put: Have you ever encountered the frustration of searching for an

important email only to discover it buried in your spam folder? How did you fix

that? You instructed your email client to no longer flag those types of emails

as spam or you added the email sender to a safe sender list. Sometimes, this

worked right away and other times this took additional tweaking of spam

filtering algorithms. Still, this is so much easier than it used to be. Back in

the day, you'd have to send that email along with the headers to someone like me

and then I'd have to go update the SpamAssassin filters that I wrote.

I'm hopeful that they'll work it out.