I have a feeling that balance consistency will be a challenge.
Discussion
I’ve been experimenting while writing ndk-wallet with three clients watching the same wallet at the same time and haven’t noticed any desyncing
I sent 29 sats to it and now see 39 sats. 😅
nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpzamhxue69uhhv6t5daezumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcscpyug Will Amethyst support this? How do you feel about it? Do you deem it safe?
Probably. We will always support anything that gets used. And I think this has a good chance of being used for real. We just need to make everyone aware of the custodial part.
> We just need to make everyone aware of the custodial part.
I've already committed a whole five bucks worth of Bitcoin to CashU mints.
If I could zap that directly in Amethyst, as much as I like the minibits wallet I've been using, my lazy arse would definitely be using Amethyst CashU zaps. Saves a click. Saves a few seconds of my time. Instant recovery just by using my nsec, no need for seeds. Simple. I like simple.
I still use legacy banking because paying my bills online is easier than getting in the car and driving to pay cash.
Sometimes, a little bit of custodial can more useful than the risk of losses for lazy arsed people like me that are willing to take the risk.