Replying to Avatar Stella Assange

Julian Assange explains the 2025 USAID debacle, eleven years ago:

‘The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government.

This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades.

Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming "civil society" into a buyer's market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm's length. The last forty years have seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.

It is not just obvious neocon front groups like Foreign Policy Initiative. It also includes fatuous Western NGOs like Freedom House, where naïve but well-meaning career nonprofit workers are twisted in knots by political funding streams, denouncing non-Western human rights violations while keeping local abuses firmly in their blind spots.

The civil society conference circuit—which flies developing-world activists across the globe hundreds of times a year to bless the unholy union between "government and private stakeholders" at geopoliticized events like the "Stockholm Internet Forum"—simply could not exist if it were not blasted with millions of dollars in political funding annually…’

Text from Sep 2014, before he was imprisoned in Belmarsh. Extracted from his book, “When Google Met WikiLeaks”. Full text and images for the first chapter are available for free here:

https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/

As a former boardmember and later secretary, then treasurer and finally president of a legitimate "NGO", after a decade of fighting for equal treatment under the law, we were faced with a harsh reality and a hard decision. Either we continued lobbying the government for change, or we turned our limited resources to public education. Upon further reflection, about 20 years ago, it became apparent the government would not change their direction because they had built up many profit centers around the present systems of injustice. This is why we decided to focus on shifting the ovorton window to awareness of the systematic violation of an essential human right within the borders of our supposed bastion of freedom. This was a daunting task, given we were the foci of disdain thanks to the efforts of the Clinton's attorney general's efforts demonizing fathers who were subjected to the family courts and departments of health finances. You can thank our unknown organization and our friends, like Kassie J., for changes in attitudes toward the role of fathers in the rearing and protection of children.

My point being, there are many NGOs not connected to government finances, simple groups exercising their legitimate right to speech, and it is this legitimacy the IC hides behind through laundered government funding.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.