Replying to Avatar bitcoin.rocks

nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m did you know censorship was the plan when you funded this?

Market participants are identifying ordinals as a spam attack on bitcoin that prices out some folks in the 3rd world for sovereignty.

Your criticism carries no weight. The network is not a monolith. Point your hash elsewhere if you don’t like it. But to argue that it’s “censorship” implies you don’t believe that the market should have a say. Which is very FIAT of you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

To explicitly exclude certain transactions is censorship.

And it's clear the market agrees.

🤷‍♂️and yet the pool grows. Enjoy your jpegs I guess