Damn, nostr:nprofile1qqsqcdcltmv4qanpx3p7svcufdsg9rkk00x7l2sknra4e6whkv59l7cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uke3478 closed our Lightning channel again.. Why? Is a balanced channel with activity not good enough?

Lightning is hard y'all

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Is your node lnd?

Yes

Should I use my CLN node?

I think LND still has an issue with channel closures. I never had that with CLN so far.

Hmmm I can see that. It said the channel was a co-operative close though. Would that still be an LND issue? Or that the peer chose to end this channel?

This will only get worse as BTC adoption grows. Lightening is fun, but it’s not a solution. It doesn’t support miners and you’re giving up autonomy and adding trust back into the system. BTC has a layer 2 problem.

We regularly close channels without activity but can you DM your pubkey/channel edge? We'd love to confirm it wasn't a fatfinger

Yes absolutely