I do. They want to own the "@" symbol. And at:// is the scheme that they want, which the IETF is not too happy about. Obviously they are quite late to that party, so it can only end up as a mess. A Bold Protocol.
What do you mean by saying they want “at://“?
Please Login to reply.
They want that to be the name of their protocol scheme. Like http:// and they are trying to register that at the IETF who manages these things.
Ok go it. So they’re looking for at://user.bsky.com to go directly to that users profile
