What do you mean?
Discussion
I'm speaking from an impartial perspective when I say this, but it can be too easy to view people who have more wealth than you as "bad" people. Some do have legitimately good intentions, but may feel as if it's pointless to try and help others due to certain obvious historically-based reasons. If someone were to give away their wealth to those less fortunate, what guarantee can they have that their wealth will be used productively? People of all financial backgrounds are notoriously unreliable when it comes to personal finance.
All I know is that she's a broken liberal who believes all wealth creation is the result of white colonialism. She isn't wrong about some things, although she has no clue how money creation makes people poor. We've had the benefit high IQ family members who know how to make cash flow their direction.
But all of them are clueless about bitcoin. I am currently schooling them.
She may never figure any of this out, but somehow she will feel more righteous for her socialist stands (and yes, she's also gay, which is relevant to the article).
Oh, I see. Well, what a ridiculous belief🙄. She just has a severe lack of understanding on how valuation is made with the use of fiat currencies. FYI, I find IQs to be a pointless measurement of overall intelligence.
Well, good luck.
🙄😮💨
I was really referring to financial IQ. Fortunately, she is not my problem. It's just that we have a society full of socialist leaning people. It's more obnoxious when they actually have the resources to take action but would rather reject it and steal other people's resources to fund their schemes.