This was an blast.
Great chat about UTXO introspection, covenants and the total activation taboo. I'm sure it will ruffle some feathers. But there conversations need to be had out loud.
Fall as sleep, drop your panties or get mad.
2hrs for your to enjoy.
---
BR052 - Convenance, Introspection, CTV and activation impasse ft. @jamesob & @rot13maxi
Notes and listening options: https://bitcoin.review/podcast/episode-52/
🎧👇 James, Rijndael & nvk debate speedy trial, activation mechanisms, and the chaos of bitcoin governance.
Excerpt https://x.com/bitcoinreviewhq/status/1707849409642279337?s=46
BR052 Convenance, Introspection, CTV and activation impasse ft nostr:npub1ta5sstxzpk7aykejp6cv8eul80m2rjfwvp3rgjw0xgjtp7s3ak5s0c96f7 & nostr:npub1mxrssnzg8y9zjr6a9g6xqwhxfa23xlvmftluakxqatsrp6ez9gjssu0htc
*** This is by far one of the top podcast episodes of year ***
nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8
🤙
❤️
Really enjoyed the conversation about activation and your different perspective gentleman.
I sympathize with your view nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 about embracing spontaneous order and the importance of lowering the attack surface for the network during potential upgrade activations.
At the same time I find myself tending to agree more with nostr:npub1ta5sstxzpk7aykejp6cv8eul80m2rjfwvp3rgjw0xgjtp7s3ak5s0c96f7 and seeking an efficient means of signaling honest market sentiment for coordinating upgrades among node operators.
There are extremely smart people in the Bitcoin space. Technically speaking, is there any possibility for a sly roundabout protocol to accurately survey market sentiment and efficiently coordinate upgrades that simultaneously effectively mitigates attack risks?
