In that case, no need to have a “ReplyGuy”. Just have a “client” that connects to every possible relay, and scrape as much data as possible, and never delete anything.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

They are likely to have >>>multiple<<< angles on post archiving, bots, >>>their own relays<<< etc to point to when needed.

Sure, but there’s simply no point to making a ReplyGuy bot if archiving is your intention. Instead of the bot “replying”, it could simply archive to a private database instead. There’s no reason to do the extra step of spamming the network for no additional benefit.

When you are building a case against someone it will always be strengthened by multiple sources of validation.

Only in a fair trial. In a kangaroo court, that's not necessary.