I agree the most important characteristic of Bitcoin is the limited supply. This can only be secure with a small blocksize and Bitcoin’s nodes. However, I disagree that Liquid would be more decentralized than Monero or BCH on a drivechain. These two combined with the hash power of BTC and the nodes securing the 21 million would be cypherpunk AF.

There’s also a problem with Liquid being "confidential" rather than "private". Liquid is a good legal company, but it’s not anarchy money that will replace fiat. I want separation of money and state; not a rock to cash in for CBDC tokens.

nostr:note1erlcykmp4xp2strrq8g88tqxe68x83lwdlyrl56fypls8lh2k0tsr3w0x8