Replying to Avatar Christi Junior

nostr:npub1ulwdkyhm92ca5ef8uj7g4kms3x52g9phaxy6jzvncsv8vmh2xfwshqmy4p nostr:npub18k6zlzcfgdgj989uv0h7xg9mxk55fszwjsyttexfvlj4h2ase9vq549kqm nostr:npub1gufcacu6k8lt7ycv5fhyd54q0v3x0z9p34z8jefdg07wgskcn23slw3lkv I really don't get the people arguing that it's wrong to harass those responsible for shit like this, because "it's only a cartoon series/only a comic book/only a movie/only a video game/ only an anime".

Cultural Vandalism is something that negatively affects thousands, potentially millions of people. Maybe it doesn't affect them in any deep, profound way, but it does affect them. It's a profoundly evil, destructive act, and the people responsible deserve every negative reaction they could possibly receive.

Those people are enablers (at best) or co-saboteurs (at worst), and they deserve the same brutality.

Cultural Vandalism is exactly that -- vandalism of an entire people. And said people (White in general, Irish in particular) are expected to just take it.

April O'Neill isn't a fat negress. I'm sure we've all seen memes of Chris Pratt, Chris Evans, or Ryan Gosling as "MLK" -- and we laugh because that'd be fucking retarded. MLK is a nigger. A movie about MLK should have a nigger in that role. Whether that actor is Idris Elba or Chris Rock or Laurence Fishburne is highly debatable. But that MLK is black is not update for debate, and casting a White actor as that role would be historically inaccurate and insulting to the intelligence of the audience.

And if a real life person (MLK) isn't comparable to a fictional character like April O'Neill -- fine. I'm sure some Jonah Hill kike can play 'Fat Albert' and all criticism is immediately invalid.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

And to needlessly belabor the point further:

> these faggots could easily have created a new femme-fatale character: "Shermaneeka Jackson-Brown"

> but they didn't

> they deliberately stole April O'Neill's name in a deliberate act of artistic sabotage