Replying to Avatar Dug

Listening to nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx and nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy , and the argument for supporting Open Sats and bitcoin developers is too strong to ignore supporting the maintenance of the network that backs my #bitcoin . Why doesn’t @saylor and the “bitcoin development company” $mstr appreciate this ?

Now there are ETFs, I think there is an argument for share holder activitism, even with the strong argument for mstr over an etf. Thoughts nostr:npub1k7vkcxp7qdkly7qzj3dcpw7u3v9lt9cmvcs6s6ln26wrxggh7p7su3c04l ?
Avatar
Chris Alaimo 1y ago 💬 1

Maybe he is an ossification Maxi is the only thing I can think of, but still the protocol and a lot of open source projects still need funding and maintenance.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Dug 1y ago 💬 2

Ossification is one thing, incremental, variance reducing, super high reliability system style improvement (sorry done some work in this area) is another thing and definitely not ossification.