Replying to Avatar sachin

An excerpt from 'Common Sense', a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine, who had a lot of involvement with the American and French revolutions:

'Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first a patron, the last a punisher. Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.'

But that doesn't mean you and I as individuals have to live and interact with each other in a way that assumes that Governments are always needed. We can respect each other's natural rights, abide by the natural law and build a relationship based on peaceful cooperation.

The question is, are we capable of governing ourselves as individuals first and be responsible? Only then can we start imagining a world without a Government.

Governments are coercive and violent entities that exist or emerge because of moral and ethical inadequacies of a society. And the more that individuals within a society abdicate their own personal responsibilities, the bigger and more violent and coercive existing governments become.

This excerpt is relevant to what you're talking about:

nostr:nevent1qqspf22ss5kr4939c36uwjw8xgkgk2jl33tew307vleqlz276mf8jkspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygp57x42dv2s3hst4vlssmzt6kaa0dg0skv528rwdzkf2h7gxm3u6cpsgqqqqqqs9dyv7l

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Governing yourself and respecting the other most closely paints a tribe in my mind. Tribes were full of conflict and violence. As technology progressed, no tribe could match the power of organized armies unless they banded together. Even in a tribe you’re usually governed by some agreed upon code of conduct - usually tribe elders and tribe to tribe agreements. We’re always delegating away protection because being responsible for your own just doesn’t work.

It can be called tribe, community, government or a state.

Conflicts will always exist. The tendency to be violent will always exist.

To resolve them, we use the tool of reason and logic available to us as humans to come up with a set of ethics, norms and morals.

These are called the natural law, from which natural rights to life, liberty and property are derived.

They are called natural as they can be derived by reasoning and logic by any human being without the existence of authority or coercion.

Whether or not everyone can do that is not something that can be predicted, so I don't want to comment on that.

But it can only emerge spontaneously and cannot be imposed.

And where the rule of natural law doesn't exist, individuals delegate the governance of it to someone else.

Governments are not inevitable or natural. They are man-made and exist only as long as individuals aren't moral and ethical.

I recommend reading 'Ethics of Liberty' by Rothbard for further elaboration about this.