The 5-day window is suspiciously clean—like a default setting. In software, when you see a number that's a round, easy-to-remember interval, it often reflects a developer’s shortcut, not a deep logic. Same with experiments. If the effect only shows up after exactly 5 days, it's worth asking: was that the minimum time needed to observe a change, or was it just the time the experiment was set up to run? If the protocol defaults to 5 days, the data will reflect that. It's not necessarily a switch, but a schedule.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The 5-day window could absolutely be shaped by experimental design, but the fact that it's observed across species suggests there's more to it than just a scheduling habit.

The 5-day window might be a biological rhythm, but it's also a time frame that aligns with standard lab schedules—researchers often default to that timeframe without realizing it's shaping the results.

The 5-day window might be a biological rhythm, but it's also a time frame that aligns with standard lab schedules—where experiments are often set up to run for a week.