All relays are paid relays.

Not everyone will pay for a relay.

Some people will, and that'll be enough.

If only one person out of a million pays for a relay, that'd be...

that'd be...

That'd be a heck of a lot of relays.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

One per house

One per neighborhood

One per region

Hmm...

Maybe one for planet

Think about it this way:

The architectural necessity for any one person to host a relay is not directly proportional to the number of users. That is why we don't need to put a relay in every client and therefore on every device (this would mean one person might end up with 3+ relays, which is complete overkill).

If the network has 2 users, it'd be best to have at least 2 relays.

The same, however, is probably also true at 10 users and 100 users.

At 1000 users, you might want to add a 3rd relay.

At 10000 users, 10 relays might be good.

And so on.

Seeing it now 👀

What I could be missing then is the ability within a relay to 'sub-relay' in so a manner that a dedicated hardware could give service to different purposes...

As I pointed with the 'house' and the 'region' relay, these already are, —in the sense of the nostr day-to-day experience—, alike theforest's and yabu's respectively: theforest's Stella house where friends and relatives are welcome; yabu's instead assures only people from certain region and language can write there; I haven't seen in that sense a 'neighborhood-relay' one yet... But then I could guess there would be stable fixed relays by the numbers you mention along several ones that comes and goes as they see fit 🤔