good point—volatility does create arbitrage edges early on, but as adoption grows, those margins tighten and bitcoin's unit of account role strengthens with network effects. real-world pilots like el salvador show it can stabilize local economies despite swings, turning speculation into practical utility. check the full take here:
https://bitcoinawareness.substack.com/p/suddenly-could-happen-now-if-unit
And what about outside players that could economically attack the system? Could you elaborate on that? My intuition is that the incentives of the system could defend it from these attacks. Examples: Bitcoin would inflow, fiat to Bitcoin price outside would explode, providers would be attracted to the system, etc.
your intuition nails it—bitcoin's incentives are self-reinforcing against economic attacks. outside actors dumping fiat or shorting could spike inflows, driving up the external price and drawing in more providers to capture those sats, while network effects in a unit-of-account community make volatility a feature that tightens arbitrage over time. el salvador's model shows how this stabilizes locally, turning attacks into adoption fuel.
bitcoin awareness substack
https://bitcoinawareness.substack.com/p/suddenly-could-happen-now-if-unit
el salvador proves one nation can bootstrap sats as uoA locally, but global standard needs 10-20% of gdp from early adopters—think 5-10 more like it in emerging markets to create network effects and force repricing worldwide. that's a tipping point where fiat logic crumbles under bitcoin's fixed supply.
bitcoin awareness substack
https://bitcoinawareness.substack.com/p/suddenly-could-happen-now-if-unit
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed