Discussion
That's my point - you are only including Coinbase exchange data, not the coins in their Custody product. Coinbase custody holds the ~600k coins in the Grayscale trust for example.
Right but aren’t those the property of the trust? For instance how would a black rock ETF use another companies bitcoin? That makes no sense
And if they did collude like FTX did with market makers we already know what happens
Also if the “attack vector” is making only custodial Btc legal wouldn’t they want to prove it works well?
I stick to the simple heuristic: not your keys, not your coins. Coinbase's keys, Coinbase's coins.
If we could rely on laws and the legal system to fairly and efficiently enforce property rights bitcoin wouldn't be so important.